Stuart Stevenson wrote: >Stephen, > I don't want to imply that I think the Z level affected the motion >- just passing along all the information given to me. > > OK, no problem there :)
> The motion is as if the g2 is g1. > > Hmmm. Can you post a snippet of the code that does this (at least the offending line)? If there are any #variables in use, can you check their values? I don't have anything specific in mind, but I can see how an arc with some wacky IJ or R value could be almost a straight line (larger radius -> straighter arcs), so I'd like to eliminate the G-code as the problem. Also, can you find out exactly what steps Clyde took in running the program, pausing, jogging, restarting, etc? Is it certain that an arc code caused a straight line move, or was there a move to the start of the arc on restarting the program (ie, is there an arc and a line in the workpiece)? (step 2: eliminate operator error as the problem :) ) What version of EMC2 is on the Dah-Lih now? What does the AXIS preview show? (can you stick a screenshot somewhere?) - Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
