Doug Crews wrote:
> I would like to thank everyone for their feedback on “resolver 
> feedback”.   As you can most likely tell from the Kollmorgan inventory I 
> have mentioned and the Parker inventory I have not mentioned, I come 
> from the old institutional motion control industry where you frequently 
> here the words “Oh, we don’t support that anymore you will need to 
> upgrade….!” The pain and scars are deep.
> 
>  
Yeah, but all that gear wouldn't be on eBay all the time if the 
mfr's didn't do that!

> 
> A new version of this machine is in the planning phase and is 
> anticipated to use 9 servos on one half and 5 steppers and a USB camera 
> on the other half.  It has a “millisecond” critical event between two 
> axes but for the most part everything else is not as critical… several 
> seconds in timing, and position is acceptable in the +/-.005” range. 
> 
>  
Well, the suitability of EMC2 is still in slight doubt.  Do you 
need to make complex moves, such as might need to be programmed 
in G-code?  Or, is this more a PLC sort of job, where this motor 
moves 20,000 encoder counts, then that motor moves 11,000?  That 
likely could be all set up with a piece of code driving HAL 
directly.  Or, you could set up a bunch of the positioning axes 
through HAL, and have the several programmed axes running under 
G-code command.

Coordinating two axes, either under G-code or HAL command to 
move in synch should be no problem.  Guve them each a position 
command at the same time and they WILL stay in synch.

The USB camera is not something we usually deal with, but as 
long as there are Linux drivers for it, and whatever image 
processing software you plan to use, then it ought to be able to 
work.  Is the camera for inspection, or does it locate some 
feature and then the machine has to perform a different move 
depending on what the camera saw?  I don't think we have done 
anything like this before, but I would be VERY interested.
(I have an old pick and place machine with an 80286 CPU, and one 
of these days it is going to croak.  It doesn't have vision now, 
but if I ever have to retrofit it, that would be something I'd 
like to add.  It would move the part over the camera, take a 
picture and then adjust the location to move the part to based 
on the image analysis.)

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to