Their goal appears to be focused on RF emissions only, but they are aware of 
low frequency phenomenon like power line harmonics and flicker.

 

Ralph

 

From: John Woodgate <[email protected]> 
Sent: November 27, 2024 12:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] pre-compliance EMC test equipment - emissions only

 

What about low-frequency conducted emissions, IEC 61000-3-2, -3, -11 and -12? I 
know some don't apply in US, but they do in adjacent countries and elsewhere.

In general, equipment from 'second rank' makers are good for pre-compliance and 
the cost savings are significant. Also, in academia, I suppose test time is not 
so significant as it is in industry.

On 2024-11-27 19:54, Ralph McDiarmid wrote:

An Adjunct Professor at UBC is looking for advice on what equipment would be 
appropriate for pre-compliance emissions testing, radiated and conducted 
emissions, using the procedures from std CISPR 22 .  I don’t know the budget, 
but I suggested to him that is an important criterion.  UBC has a 3 metre 
semi-anechoic EMC chamber on-site.  

 

Thanks everyone,

 

 

 

Ralph McDiarmid

 

Vancouver, BC

 

 


  _____  


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
<https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/%20>  

Website: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/  <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/> 
Instructions: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) <https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html> 
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Rick Linford at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher at: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  


  _____  


To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC 
<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1> &A=1 

-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best Wishes
John Woodgate
Keep trying

 


 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 

Virus-free. 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 www.avg.com

 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to