Shielded magnetic loops often don't work as well as unshielded loops!  The 
shielding causes strong resonances that affect frequency response by tens of 
dB. The shields only appear to work to suppress e-fields if the e-fields are 
symmetric around the centerline of the loop, a condition that is met in the far 
field but not in most other uses. Also, the point of most e-field rejection on 
the probe is over the gap in the shield!!!

If you want to see how I arrived at the above from measurements (never seen 
this in a book) and analysis, read the paper and articles from my website 
linked below.

https://emcesd.com/pdf/emc99-w.pdf
My 1999 EMC Symposium paper.
And these articles from my site.

  *   June 2008, The Square Shielded Loop - Part 2, Parasitic 
Coupling<https://emcesd.com/tt2008/tt060208.htm>
(Electric Field Shielding of Magnetic Loops is Not Always Effective!)
  *   July 2008, The Square Shielded Loop - Part 3, Parasitic Coupling Between 
Unshielded Wire Loops<https://emcesd.com/tt2008/tt070508.htm>
  *   August 2008, The Square Shielded Loop - Part 4, Coupling to a 
PCB<https://emcesd.com/tt2008/tt080108.htm>
(From Shielded and Unshielded Magnetic Loops

I tell attendees of my seminars a good way to get a free lunch from many EMC 
engineers is to ask them where on a shielded loop it is least sensitive to 
e-fields. Most do not realize it is right over the gap in the shield where the 
e-field is symmetric around the centerline of the loop. The explanation and 
supporting data is in the paper above.

Worried about e-field coupling to unshielded loops? This very easy to measure 
in a few seconds, like 3 seconds, also covered above.

For 90% of my measurements with loops  unshielded one work best.

I wish analysis like the above was widely covered in the literature. If you 
know of another source, please let me know. When I realized most of what I have 
been told about magnetic loops when I was younger was wrong, it motivated me to 
write the above articles and paper. Maybe I should combine all of the above 
into a new paper.

Doug Smith
Sent from my iPhone
IPhone: 408-858-4528
Office: 702-570-6108
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://dsmith.org

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
[email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Website:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/
Instructions:  https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)
List rules: https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Sherman at: [email protected]
Rick Linford at: [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to