<The 'state of the art' is quite likely to have moved on in less than 3 years. It's also possible that EU legislation has changed during that time.>

Indeed, there is an urgent need to speed up the process of standards creation/modification, as both have happened, though it is more a process of iteration to get to a final acceptable result.

That said, the consensus process in creating standards is difficult to upgrade, seen how this is currently organized.

An quite ambitious effort of the Commission ( https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_661) to limit the decisionĀ  processĀ  for EU-standards to EU stakeholdersĀ  (only) may help.

(This has of course the added inconvenience of creating a potential divergence between International and European versions of standards, I personally believe however, that the majority of the world will follow the EU-versions, simply because it is too expensive to create multiple approved versions of equipment. )

but most "field" problems are not caused by state of the art problems, but occur due to insufficient knowledge of technical committees on legal concepts, by for example allowing 2 different but (thought) equivalent tests for one requirement. The uncertainty caused by having the manufacturer make an open choice between 2 test methods is legally not acceptable. If test are different, than it means that there can be different results under different test conditions. Otherwise a single test would be sufficient as specification. Creating sufficient guiding to support 2 tests can be quite challenging, if this needs to be precise and exhaustive. Gert Gremmen

On 26-3-2022 11:50, John Woodgate wrote:
The 'state of the art' is quite likely to have moved on in less than 3 years. It's also possible that EU legislation has changed during that time.

--
Independent Expert on CE marking
EMC Consultant
Electrical Safety Consultant

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
begin:vcard
fn:Gert Gremmen
n:Gremmen;Gert
adr:;;Lieu Dit Pirot;Chauffailles;;71170;France
email;internet:[email protected]
tel;cell:+33 7 84507010
note;quoted-printable:Independent Expert on CE marking =
	=0D=0A=
	Harmonised Standards (HAS-) Consultant @ European Commission for RED, LVD=
	 and EMC=0D=0A=
	EMC Consultant=0D=0A=
	Electrical Safety Consultant=0D=0A=
	
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to