On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 6:06 PM Bari <[email protected]> wrote: > After 4 months of no replies I'd call that abandoned. How much longer > should you wait? Fork it publicly and move on with our lives. It's > trivial to merge later IF the other fork maintainer reappears. People > get sick or worse, have kids, loose interest, etc etc. > > Bari, your sentence phrasing is really hilarious if you do not parse the comma properly... People get sick or worse, have kids... LOL...
> On 4/7/26 4:04 AM, Luca Toniolo wrote: > > Scott has been out for about 4 months, no answers no merging, does > anyone else have the administration access to the > linuxcnc-ethercat/linuxcnc-ethercat repo on GitHub? Users on the forum have > been pointed to my fork, but I am not sure that is proper, Sascha's work is > not compatible at the moment, need some guidance from a maintainer for > direction on the project... > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-developers mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > Luca, I agree with Bari, 4 months with no response can be construed as abandoned. Also, the Go dependencies introduced in this project was a bit of a bother anyways. I'd much prefer to use grotius' fork available at https://codeberg.org/skynet/linuxcnc-ethercat where he moved everything to a CMake file although he lost most of the directory structure. -automata > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
