Jean Louis <b...@static.rcdrun.com> writes:

> Sure. Though ANY output of ANY LLM, I only consider as a generated
> text draft for human to be verified.

Thank you for taking the trouble to generate the LLM response.

> I don't think there is the answer below that you wanted to get. Can it
> think? I don't think so.

Your email address is bounced and that is why I've not messaged directly.

When you know to say, "I don't know."  How do you think "AI" techniques
may arrive at that thought?

-- 
vl

---
via emacs-tangents mailing list 
(https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
  • ... Jean Louis
    • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
      • ... Jean Louis
        • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
          • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Eli Zaretskii
            • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Eli Zaretskii
            • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
            • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
            • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
            • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Van Ly via Emacs news and miscellaneous discussions outside the scope of other Emacs mailing lists
            • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Eli Zaretskii
            • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
            • ... Jean Louis
            • ... Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide

Reply via email to