* Emanuel Berg <in...@dataswamp.org> [2024-08-09 10:20]: > Abraham S.A.H." via "Emacs development discussions. wrote: > > >> It doesn't take much experience to do cool things fast in > >> Python, it is a fact. > > > > I agree to disagree, Emanuel! Sorry, but I do not think > > "Python is a generally better programming language". > > Devel time faster than in Lisp, is what I'm saying.
I believe that the speed of development is influenced by how the programmer has structured the foundational components. I believe Lisp-like languages are ideal for this purpose. Unlike many other languages, which can make speeding up development a challenge, Lisp-like languages make the process much easier and more straightforward. I am sorry that you haven't arrived at that understanding yet, but it's great that you grasped it in another language. What works, works. I would use software in any language if it gives me product or service I need. > Maybe one could have a Lisp that also was as fast or almost as > fast, if one focused on that aspect. I gave you references, Lisp is so much faster than your praised babies. --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
