* Emanuel Berg <in...@dataswamp.org> [2024-08-15 10:05]: > Madhu wrote: > > >>> Comprehension of the user's program reaches its greatest > >>> heights for Lisp programs, because the simplicity of Lisp > >>> syntax makes intelligent editing operations easier to > >>> implement, while the complexity of other languages [...] > >> > >> Sorry, but we don't have _any_ of those advantages :) > > > > While the basic sexp structure sull seems the same, now to > > understand the "modern code" you have to refer understand > > and familiarize yourself and read documentation of the > > constructs in the other languages before you can > > understand elisp. > > I have 29 656 functions (of those are 8040 interactive) if > this script is correct [1] > > For 'emacs -Q', or if you just run the script, the result is: > 8559 functions (3014 interactive)
I got 983 in my Emacs Lisp directory. So I do not fund 30,000 functions in source too much really. --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
