* Óscar Fuentes <o...@wanadoo.es> [2023-01-18 17:09]: > Sure^2. I was talking about _why_ (*) and (* a) are supported in Elisp. > Once the language designer chose to support those expressions and > decided that they must return a number (instead of something else like a > partially applied function) the value they shall return comes from the > properties of the underlying operation, of course.
OK and I understood that somebody decided to include that. Why did they decide to include it? Do you think it is only for `apply' reasons? -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/
