Hi Matt, Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm wondering what kind of work is required to make use of org-cite and > org-citeproc at present. In particular, I'm wondering what kinds of changes > I'll need to make to my current setup, and whether it's worthwhile to use > my ultra-slow coding skills to create whatever glue is still necessary. At the moment, org-cite/org-citeproc has no way of talking to Zotero. So you'd need to manually export citation data from Zotero to a format that pandoc-citeproc understands, like BibTex. It sounds like zotxt and zotxt-emacs provide a lot of what's needed to glue org-cite together with Zotero; so one thing that would be helpful, if you're up for it, is hacking org-cite to pull bibliography data from Zotero in a format that can be passed to org-citeproc. I don't use Zotero myself, so this is something I'm unlikely to do anytime soon without some help. (Borrowing code from zotxt-emacs and putting it in org-cite is probably the way to go here, as I doubt that we want to make zotxt-emacs a dependency of org-cite.) > All of this is fine for my current purposes, but I would like to figure out > a more flexible and enduring solution, so I'd like to try out org-cite and > org-citeproc. But I'm not quite sure what's required, and whether there's > support currently for odt and html export. `Flexible and enduring' does not describe org-citeproc at the moment. :) I'd be very happy to have you test out org-citeproc and give feedback that will help improve it, but I can't recommend that you rely on it or switch to it for serious work any time soon. It is a working proof-of-concept, but only that. Still, there is support in org-cite/org-citeproc for both HTML and ODT export, and it handles quite a few of the common cases. So let me know if you're interested in trying it out. There are brief installation instructions in the README (https://github.com/wyleyr/org-citeproc); let me know if you need more than that. Best, Richard