Hello, Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes:
> Thinking about it, I don't think that the combinations should be defined > in the linting library, but in the language definition (ob-XXX.el), by a > function which returns all tested combinations, i.e. all combinations > which have been tested, including if they work or not. The linting > library could then query these lists and use them. > > This would keep the language definition in the ob-XXX.el file and make > it easier to maintain. This is already the case. See, e.g., `org-babel-header-args:R' and `org-babel-common-header-args-w-values'. The linting library doesn't hard-code any combination anymore. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738
