Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Nicolas, > > 2015ko otsailak 18an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: >> >> I think we should postpone the idea of attributes for object, as it gets >> in the way of the discussion. IMO, >> >> [cite/subtype: ...] >> >> is all we need, syntax-wise. > > The question of attributes for objects arose out of the desire to attach > attributes to citations. So, I think it needs to be decided whether to > support a special syntax for citation attributes, or defer that to the > more general question of attributes for objects. In the latter case, a > significant number of “power user” (read: early adopter) features won’t > be available until object attributes are also implemented.
Attributes are useful in their own right, but for the problem at hand they are a distraction (IMO, but I'm also not a power-user). > IOW, citation syntax and object attributes are separate discussions, > but are also (possibly) both part of the path from the status quo to > citation support in org core. Why? With one λ the sky is the limit! It can call whatever crazy functions that do whatever crazy things you can imagine. IOW: if you are old enough to color your citations pink in latex you are also old enough to write a macro that adds [cite:COLOR] or [cite:subtype-color] for all colors in the rainbow... —Rasmus -- Me gusta la noche, me gustas tú
