Hi, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > >> So, the (opinionated) useful defaults in biblatex are: >> cite(s), parencite(s), footcite(s), texcite(s), fullcite, >> footfullcite, nocite > > Isn't footcite/footfullcite a choice made at the document's level > instead of per citation? If that's the case, it could go in a keyword, > e.g., > > #+LATEX_CITATION: :style footcite >
I have only used footcite in beamer presentations so far. It is quite common to show a fullframe image and have a footcitation. But I also mixed them with parencites, when a specicic item on the page is attributed to a given reference. Maybe one could debate about using something other that footcite for the former use case. So, I don't have too strong an opinion here. I just wanted to throw in a use-case where this decision was not made on the per-document level. Regards, Andreas
