Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > >> If you write something like >> >> [cite: pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2] >> >> wouldn't it possible to guess you want to use multicite? IOW, does using >> "multicite" really implies a change in the syntax? > > To fully support multicite you need keyless citations in the beginning and > the end of the list, e.g. > > [cite: common pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; common post] > > Of course, for textcite it's easy to replicate wihtout. For parencites > and footcites, less so.
I think [cite: common pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; common post] is regular and readable enough. So, there's no need to add special support for multicite. Regards,