Am 09.12.2014 um 09:58 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > Rainer Stengele <rainer.steng...@online.de> writes: > >> The only thing that is different from the past is that any "comment" in the >> PROPERTIES section does seem to confuse the exporter. >> I removed >> >> :PROPERTIES: >> :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: >> x:/0PROJEKT/Kunden/customer/customer-Dokumentation-yyyymmdd.html >> EXPORT_FILE_NAME: >> x:/0PROJEKT/Kunden/customer/customer-Dokumentation-another-title.html >> :EXPORT_TITLE: Stoll - IT (HW/SW) - Zugänge - Konfigurationen [Stand: >> yyyymmdd] >> :END: >> >> As an example I removed the second line in the :PROPERTIES: block and >> the standard html export does respect the file name again. > > Org syntax is much less tolerant wrt property drawers now: they can only > contain node properties. > > > Regards, > > Good to know and reasonable. I am glad the simple (non publishing) functionality did not disappear.
I found another strange thing: I do start my Org files with a headline. If the :PROPERTIES: block follows after a blank line the settings are not observed for the subtree. If I delete that empty line it works (filename path is observed). I wonder if this is intended? If yes it could confuse users of such a properties block, thinking it works for the related subtree no matter if empty lines are there or not. Thank you. Regards, Rainer
