On 2014-10-03, at 09:08, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes: > >> What is my misconception here? > > as I learned myself from Nicolas recently, these are internal functions, > the API function for interpreting is > > ,----[ C-h f org-element-interpret-data RET ] > | org-element-interpret-data is an autoloaded compiled Lisp function in > | `org-element.el'. > | > | (org-element-interpret-data DATA &optional PSEUDO-OBJECTS) > | > | Interpret DATA as Org syntax. > | > | DATA is a parse tree, an element, an object or a secondary string > | to interpret. > | > | Optional argument PSEUDO-OBJECTS is a list of symbols defining > | new types that should be treated as objects. An unknown type not > | belonging to this list is seen as a pseudo-element instead. Both > | pseudo-objects and pseudo-elements are transparent entities, i.e. > | only their contents are interpreted. > | > | Return Org syntax as a string. > `----
Thanks a lot, that fixes my problem! Now I'll move on to the next one;-). (I don't have it yet, but I'm sure I'll invent something.) Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University
