I would like to ping this question, as it is still bothering me and I could not find any explanation.
Thanks, Rainer Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Rainer, > > 2014ko irailak 5an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen: >> >> Absolutely - but this has been (unfortunately!!!!!!!) be deprecated: >> >> Quoted from the manual [1] : >> >> ,---- >> | [1] The deprecated syntax for default header argument properties, using >> | the name of the header argument as a property name directly, evaluates >> | the property as seen by the corresponding source block definition. This >> | behavior has been kept for backwards compatibility. >> `---- >> >> I was using this deprecated behavior and I was *very* happy with it, but >> I am trying to adjust to the new syntax. >> >> So how can I use the new syntax? > > Eric Schulte has said <http://mid.gmane.org/87wqce0w9n....@gmail.com> > that the deprecation of this feature is “premature”. I didn’t realize > at the time that the deprecation was also included in the manual rather > than just a code comment. Possibly it should be un-deprecated. > > Certainly I agree that the suggested replacement is less capable. Sorry > I can’t help more. Maybe Eric or Achim (who introduced the deprecation) > will comment. -- Rainer M. Krug email: Rainer<at>krugs<dot>de PGP: 0x0F52F982
pgpQtmWoH1Rmf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
