Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Thorsten Jolitz <tjol...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Thats what I thought, but wouldn't it be nicer to treat switches and >> header args more uniformly here? > > Header arguments are for Babel consumption. Switches are not. I see no > reason to treat them similarly. > >> Otherwise custom solutions are needed to store the switches in some >> place when nuking the surrounding #+begin/#+end lines in a conversion >> process, and restore them again when converting back to Org. Or the >> switches-info is simply lost during conversion. > > Since you already store header args, it isn't much difficult to also > store switch, is it?
Ok, thanks, thats what I wanted to know (not necessarily what I wanted to hear though), so I need a custom solution. -- cheers, Thorsten
