Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: hi samuel,
> i think there are several misunderstanding here. maybe not? > first, i am not talking about outorg at all. i am talking about babel > source code blocks. i have changed the subject header to make that > more obvious. outorg is not relevant to this thread, as far as i can > tell. Me too, but I had to deal with this because doing C-c ' in babel src-blocks in an *outorg-edit-buffer* might introduce newlines/indentation even if no editing takes place, and these unwanted changes cause problems because they are propagated to the original source file in the outorg conversion process. So I would say we talk about the same thing, just in a different context. > second, emacs behavior is not built in. it depends on > require-final-newline. if babel would respect require-final-newline, > i would be happy. however, it does not. so it is not an emacs issue > in this respect. Ah, `require-final-newline' was the var I was looking for when dealing with this. Thx for the tip. > third, before posting the original post, i fully tested both the > variable that you suggested and require-final-newline. the value of > the former determines which bug occurs. Just gave a hint at the risk that you might be aware of it already. > i hope that's enough to get us all on the same page. i have very > severe rsi so i limit typing to less than 4 minutes at a time. i > won't be able to reply for some time. Anyway, the issue deserves some attention. -- cheers, Thorsten
