Hi Waldemar, Would this be used in parallel with org-mode? Would it replace it or complement it?
I'm not very familiar with what you are trying to replace or augment. Kind regards, gcr Grant Rettke | AAAS, ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM, Sigma Xi g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously.” --Thompson On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Waldemar Quevedo <waldemar.quev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Org mode users, > > I've had the idea for some time of using Org babel functionality > as a method to provide configuration management > features and the result is the following: > > https://github.com/wallyqs/org-converge > > Note that this uses the Ruby implementation of the Org mode parser > that I've been maintaining to interop with some useful gems from Ruby, like > rake and foreman. > > The idea here is to a able to use Org Babel not only > for reproducible research, but also for reproducible runs entirely. > This way a local development environment could be considered to be > a run where the processes run in parallel, or in the case > of the configuration of a server, we rely on the tangling > syntax from Org Babel as well defined idempotency checks > to make sure that the configuration from a server converges. > > In case you have some feedback, please let me know! > Feel free to create any issues in the tracker in case > you think that the idea has potential :) > > Thanks, > > - Waldemar >
