Omid: The idea is C-x 3, clone-indirect-buffer, so I can see and modify the same buffer in two different places. So.. A workaround, not a solution.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Omid <omidl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With clone-indirect-buffer you'll get a twin copy of your original > buffer. You are in effect editing the same buffer in two different , > with some additional niceties like having separate modes and > narrow-to-region, etc (see an example usage at > http://demonastery.org/2013/04/emacs-narrow-to-region-indirect/). I > don't see how this can help with your problem, though. > > On 06/05/2014 12:52 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > > Aldric Giacomoni <trev...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> I'd like to be able to create multiple tables on the same rows, like > >> such: > >> > >> | Group | Name | | Something | Else | > >> |----------+----------| |-----------------+----- --| > >> | 1 | foo | | Yes | No | > >> |----------+----------| |-----------------+-------| > >> > >> This might be based on a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of how to > >> use tables, org-mode and emacs, but I would find it useful to be able > >> to compare tables and making changes easily without scrolling too > >> much. > >> > >> Someone on #emacs pointed me towards clone-indirect-buffer, which > >> works for my purposes, but I figured I'd ask here and ask all you > >> experts if this idea is reasonable or crazy-pants. > > > > 1+ for crazy-pants > > > > -- > Omid > > Sent from my Emacs > >
