Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes: > So the reason why I think it would be advantageous to have these files > in org does not lie with the programmer familiar with emacs-lisp, but > with somebody familiar with the other side.
Sorry I was too terse in my previous answer: I completely agree with the goal you describe, but I don't think adding an .org source along the .el output (say e.g. ob-R.org and ob-R.el) will simplify my life as a maintainer: each time an ob-*.org file is changed we need to tangle it again... and this leads to auto-tangling, auto-committing considerations that I don't even want to start thinking about. -- Bastien
