Aaron Ecay writes:
> How does this sound as an algorithm:
> 1. if :file is present, behave exactly as we do now
> 2. if :file is absent but :file-ext and a #+name is present, generate a
>    :file parameter from :output-dir, the #+name, and :file-ext.

3. If both :file and :file-ext are present, :file takes precedence and
:file-ext is ignored.

> 1. should :file-ext without a #+name be a no-op, or an error?

Since you are hoping to inherit these via properties, this should be a
nop if not applicable.

> 2. should :output-dir apply to the :file case as well?

I'd say no since it seems this would be backwards-incompatible.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada


Reply via email to