Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > On 4/11/14, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: >> That's expected. Users don't think Org is clever enough to >> decrypt-demote-subtrees-then-re-encrypt on the fly. > > i was not suggesting this.
Then I didn't understand what you suggested. Can you restate it again? Thanks, -- Bastien
