Feng Shu <tuma...@gmail.com> writes: > Alan Schmitt <alan.schm...@polytechnique.org> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm collaborating on a paper with some colleagues, and I convinced them >> to use org-mode. I'm trying to make sure the paper is as self-contained >> as possible (I don't want them to have to change their emacs >> configuration file).To change the documentclass name of the exported > > Maybe you can write a Makefile to change their emacs configure...
I don't want to push my luck ;-) >> My questions are: >> - is there a way to do this without an emacs-lisp block? >> - is there a nicer way to make sure that an emacs-lisp block is >> evaluated upon export than ":exports results :results silent"? (If >> I don't put it there, the block is not evaluated.) >> - is there a way to just say the name of the documentclass without all >> the boilerplate code below? In other words, can I say "this is a llncs >> documentclass with the same sectioning as an article"? > > You should defun a classe for llncs.sty before use it. maybe > you can rename llncs.sty to article.sty, and put it to directory which contain > your org file. Yes, this could be a way to do it. The current approach works, I find it a little bit too verbose, though. Thank you for the suggestion, Alan
