Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 09:50:24 Bastien <b...@gnu.org> napisał(a):
> Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes: > > > But I'd strongly suggest making nil the default value. I find the > > current setting strongly unintuitive (unless one read the manual, > > that is;)), and not really needed (at least for me). If I have the > > export results in a separate buffer or file, why would I need them > > in the kill ring? > > I guess the default value is a left-over from the time when the HTML > export was just a quick hack, targetting users who want to export > small Org buffer and copy that into another (bigger) HTML file. Not > sure. > > > Besides, I often want to do something like this: kill a fragment > > of my buffer (usually some option, but not necessarily), export the > > file, decide that I preferred the previous version, and yank it > > back. Obviously, I can use undo - but what about yanking it in > > another place, for instance? > > I don't know any other place than the kill-ring, but setting > `org-export-copy-to-kill-ring' to nil should solve the problem, > already, no? Well, yes - it did it for me, at least. But it required setting the option. And I suspect that what the majority of users might need/expect is having this option set to nil - that was what I meant. BTW, I also think that Org is awesome. Thanks a lot! -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University
