Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think this is the right fix. IIRC, I replaced "\ul" with > "\uline" a while ago for some reason (maybe a problem with newline > or unicode, I cannot remember). This would go backwards. > > There are probably other solutions (e.g., remove all underline markup in > sections). Yes, maybe there is a better fix. If you can find why you used \uline instead of \ul that will help spot possible problems with the current fix, of course. I'm not for getting rid of the problem before we can tell for sure why the current solution is wrong. -- Bastien
