On Mar 20, 2014, at 21:34, Charles Berry <ccbe...@ucsd.edu> wrote:
> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha <at> med.uni-goettingen.de> writes: > >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Michael Weylandt <michael.weylandt <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I want to put a summary of my analysis at the beginning of a document >>> using results calculated at the end of the document. Is this possible? > > [snip] > >>> >>> Is this possible in a single pass? > > > Not quite. The method suggested by Andreas computes the result twice. If > there is any randomness in the results (as in the example) you will get a > different answer in the summary than when the block is later evaluated. > >>> I've played with #+NAME and >>> <<block()>> but haven't gotten the out-of-order evaluation quite >>> right. > > You can use > > #+results: the-mean > > before > > #+NAME: the-mean > #+begin_src R > mean(x) > #+end_src > > which is after 'theanalysis' block. > > And if the format is not pleasing add a filter that reformats the results Great. The named result block is just what I needed. > > IMO, needing ':exports results' for inline src blocks is a bug not a > feature. > Agreed, particularly in light of Eric's comments at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-03/msg00285.html There's the variable org-babel-inline-header-args, but it seems using #+PROPERTY: header-args :exports both overrules/breaks it Would org want something like #+PROPERTY: inline-header-args :exports results Or just 'hard-code' :exports results for all inline blocks?
