Thanks for the report. I'm not super familiar with how the texht option
works. I did made the following change base on recommendation from Nicolas
in the :options-alist.
(:latex-hyperref-p nil "texht" org-latex-with-hyperref t)
to
(:latex-hyperref nil nil org-latex-hyperref-template t)
>From Nicolas: "... we can replace "texht" with nil since it doesn't make
much sense to specify a full template from the OPTIONS line."
I believe the patch worked without substituting "texht" with nil in this
line.
I'm not sure if this is a regression or if your document requires updating.
That's not my call. Just chiming in with what's relevant to this side
effect you're experiencing.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote:
> Aloha all,
>
> I noticed yesterday that a legacy document with this option:
>
> #+OPTIONS: texht:nil
>
> is now broken in a recent Org mode from master.
>
> The following lines now appear in the LaTeX export, when they didn't
> before:
>
> \hypersetup{
> pdfkeywords={},
> pdfsubject={},
> pdfcreator={Emacs 24.3.1 (Org mode 8.2.5h)}}
>
> I haven't looked at this patch, but I'm guessing that it is responsible.
>
> It would be great if the texht option could still be supported. If not,
> can someone offer advice on the best way to set
> org-latex-hyperref-template to achieve the same file-local effect?
>
> All the best,
> Tom
>
>
> Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hi Nicolas,
> >
> > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> I think this patch is already in master.
> >
> > Indeed, sorry for the noise,
> >
> > PS: let's confirm on the list when a patch gets applied, that
> > helps archiving threads faster.
>
> --
> Thomas S. Dye
> http://www.tsdye.com
>
