Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:26:28PM +0100, Rasmus wrote: >> Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> writes: >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:15:50AM +0100, Bastien wrote: >> >> Hi Rasmus and Nicolas, >> >> >> > >> >> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> Let me know if you find you'd be willing to merge something like this >> >> > >> >> > I don't know enough HTML to have an opinion here. >> >> >> > >> > I don't think it's a bad change, but i have a couple of concerns: >> > >> > 1. It's a breaking change. >> > 2. The default should mimic the current functionality: >> > ='((div . div))= >> > 3. The customization should be more structured, not just a >> > string (see e.g., =org-html-text-markup-alist=.) >> > >> > Attached is a modification of the patch which fixes 2 & 3. #1 is a >> > question more for Nicolas & Bastien... >> >> It seems you modified v1 rather than v2 that I send last night¹? I'm >> not sure if point 1 holds in the second revision as it explicitly >> allows for a string as now. I think I disagree with your point 2 as it >> only shows up when you use HTML5-fancy. On point 3, > > But not everyone using html5-fancy would agree with your choice of > hierarchy, and it should be up to indvidual users to add additional > semantic structure to the output.
It's a variable that you can set in your project or in your Org file or in your init file. I don't see why div × 3 is better than section article div or something else conditional on two variables being explicitly set to get fancy HTML5. . . In any case, I don't have strong—if any—preferences on this. >> org-html-text-markup-alist is nice. What do you want to see in >> addition to the current structure (in patch v2)? > > Somehow I never saw the original thread, only the email cc'ing me > directly. I went to gmane to find the patch, and obviously grabbed the > wrong one. > > Could you please send me the (new) patch so that i can review it? Here's the Gmane link. I believe it's different than what you reviewed before, but perhaps I'm wrong. . . >> Footnotes: >> ¹ http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/83635 —Rasmus -- ツ
