as far as i know, my assessment below is correct, but i cannot confirm. i believe that if undo-related code is ripped out of babel, then undo will work correctly in the source buffer and in the edit buffer. i am not clear on what the purpose of changing undo behavior is?
On 10/28/13, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > I think, but not sure, that: > > - your original patch had the right idea, and i think it improved > it, but did not fix it > - my tiny fix seemed to fix it, but i did not test enough > - i avoid the bug rather than carrying along my patch or yours > - my impression is that the bug was due to unnecessary undo fanciness > - there might have been a patch that made it into the repo? > > Samuel > > On 10/28/13, Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2013ko urriak 28an, Samuel Wales-ek idatzi zuen: >>> >>> Hi Aaron, >>> >>> Below? >>> >>> If you mean my fix, I don't know why it worked and cannot investigate >>> it. >>> >>> Samuel >> >> Argh, I must have mistakenly deleted the quoted text from my reply; I >> did mean the suggestion to comment out the line >> >> (setq buffer-undo-list ul) >> >> But since my original patch worked for you (?), all should be fine now. >> >> -- >> Aaron Ecay >> > > > -- > The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com > > The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY can get > it. > > Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW. > -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY can get it. Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.
