Hi All, > Yes. In the meantime, other users' voices can help us step back and > see things differently.
(For reference: I have been using org-mode -- for TODO lists and note taking -- for a few years now, but have not contributed code.) I imagine myself as a naive user (which does not take too much) who does not know the internal structure of org and its syntax. If I execute org-open-at-point at the start of a line with a link and get the message "No link at point", I think "Ah, I need to move point onto the link." I do and all is good. So I find myself in Nicholas' camp in regards to the discussion of org-open-at-point. I think any pains -- which seem to be quite minor -- associated with the change in behavior are worth the gains in uniformity and clarity. And here I am thinking here not only about my day-to-day use of org-mode, but also of my (slow) journey towards understanding more about how it works. But if my point is on a link in a comment, and I do org-open-at-point, and get the message "No link at point", then I think, "But why? I am on something that looks like a link". So in regards to the discussion of links in comments, I see more clearly the argument Bastien, Michael, etc. are making. But I am unsure here how to judge whether the benefits outweigh the costs. Perhaps that is helpful; perhaps not! Best Regards, Josiah
