Another user here, chiming in to support Nicolas's position. From my perspective orgmode is so vast and complicated that the number one thing we need (even from a user perspective) is predictability. I'd rather see minor conveniences removed in favor of a constancy and a logical interface.
Best, Ista On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Gustav Wikström <gustav.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, a "user" signing in. Although not involved in the development of this > piece of software I'm taking the opportunity to chime in anyway. > > I'd like to give Nicolas Goaziou my support in this issue. It makes it much > simpler to understand, use, develop and maintain the software if it is > congruent. A well defined syntax, and tools that respect the rules of how to > parse it, will IMO be of big importance moving forward. > > About the issue of two links on the same line.. From my perspective (for > what it's worth); Trying to open a link when not being inside a link with > the mark should give the same behaviour as trying to open a link when on a > headline. It is not certain which link is intended to be opened, so why not > give the user the options available instead of guessing? Set the scope to > parse to the current paragraph, to make a difference from calling C-c C-o > from the headline. That, to me, is the intuitive behaviour. > > About the issue of links in comments (My opinion, for what it's worth): It's > a comment.. Expect it to behave as one. Worst case: copy the link and paste > it in the browser. > > About the issue of links in properties: Wouldn't it be nice to allow this? > Maybe a future functionality to consider? > > > Best regards > > Gustav Wikström
