Aloha John, John Kitchin <jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> Maybe I am missing something, what would the utility of #+toc: figures be? > Is it only for export? Yes, it is. > I would make a link: [[elisp:org-list-of-figures]] where > org-list-of-figures is an emacs-lisp function that would parse the buffer > and present you with a list of clickable links to the figures. You could > alternatively make this a new org-link, so you could also specify how it > exports, eg. > > [[lof:click-me][List of Figures]] This is a neat idea. Thanks! All the best, Tom > > That would be pure org-markup, and make org more useful, and it would also > happen to support LaTeX export too. I guess you would recognize figures as > extensions in the file links. > > > John > > ----------------------------------- > John Kitchin > Associate Professor > Doherty Hall A207F > Department of Chemical Engineering > Carnegie Mellon University > Pittsburgh, PA 15213 > 412-268-7803 > http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote: > >> Aloha Nicolas, >> >> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: >> > >> >> I can imagine that a list of figures is a difficult problem in some >> >> other back-ends. However, its absence in LaTeX export seems unusual. >> > >> > Org doesn't cover all LaTeX facilities. There are #+LATEX: >> > and #+BEGIN_LATEX...#+END_LATEX to fill the gap. >> > >> >> Would it make sense to have this work as expected for LaTeX export (and >> >> perhaps other back-ends where it does make sense) >> > >> > We can start to discuss what a good implementation could be for major >> > back-ends. But implementing it for LaTeX only is, IMO, not worth the >> > trouble: >> > >> > #+toc: figures >> > >> > vs. >> > >> > #+latex: \listoffigures >> >> AFAICT the new exporter works flawlessly. I'm confident that it will >> let me produce LaTeX to any practical specification. >> >> My original query came about because I was trying to write Org markup >> and *not* drop down to LaTeX. In this context--Org as a lightweight >> markup language--the possibility of creating all but one of the >> "lists-of" with #+TOC: seems like the markup language core is missing a >> piece. >> >> I look forward to the discussion of implementations for the major >> back-ends. Let me know if I can help in any way. >> >> All the best, >> Tom >> >> -- >> Thomas S. Dye >> http://www.tsdye.com >> >> > Maybe I am missing something, what would the utility of #+toc: figures > be? Is it only for export? > > I would make a link: [[elisp:org-list-of-figures]] where > org-list-of-figures is an emacs-lisp function that would parse the > buffer and present you with a list of clickable links to the figures. > You could alternatively make this a new org-link, so you could also > specify how it exports, eg. > > [[lof:click-me][List of Figures]] > > That would be pure org-markup, and make org more useful, and it would > also happen to support LaTeX export too. I guess you would recognize > figures as extensions in the file links. > > John > > ----------------------------------- > John Kitchin > Associate Professor > Doherty Hall A207F > Department of Chemical Engineering > Carnegie Mellon University > Pittsburgh, PA 15213 > 412-268-7803 > http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote: > > Aloha Nicolas, > > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > > > >> I can imagine that a list of figures is a difficult problem in > some > >> other back-ends. However, its absence in LaTeX export seems > unusual. > > > > Org doesn't cover all LaTeX facilities. There are #+LATEX: > > and #+BEGIN_LATEX...#+END_LATEX to fill the gap. > > > >> Would it make sense to have this work as expected for LaTeX > export (and > >> perhaps other back-ends where it does make sense) > > > > We can start to discuss what a good implementation could be for > major > > back-ends. But implementing it for LaTeX only is, IMO, not worth > the > > trouble: > > > > #+toc: figures > > > > vs. > > > > #+latex: \listoffigures > > AFAICT the new exporter works flawlessly. I'm confident that it > will > let me produce LaTeX to any practical specification. > > My original query came about because I was trying to write Org > markup > and *not* drop down to LaTeX. In this context--Org as a > lightweight > markup language--the possibility of creating all but one of the > "lists-of" with #+TOC: seems like the markup language core is > missing a > piece. > > I look forward to the discussion of implementations for the major > back-ends. Let me know if I can help in any way. > > All the best, > Tom > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > http://www.tsdye.com > > > -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
