Hi Samuel, I think not. I get these results now:
#+call: repeated-text(x="foo",eg=example) :results raw #+results: 1. this is the first line 2. this is the second line with foo as the value 3. this is the third line All the best, Tom Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > hi thomas, > > is this still a bug? > > samuel > > > On 11/22/13, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote: >> Aloha all, >> >> Responding to a query by Gary Oberbrunner, I tried to point out the use >> of example blocks to name arbitrary pieces of text. What I found is that >> the example block isn't passed whole to a babel source block--whitespace >> is removed from the first line. >> >> * Whitespace on first line of example block removed >> >> #+name: example >> #+begin_example >> 1. this is the first line >> 2. this is the second line with %VARIANT% as the value >> 3. this is the third line v>> #+end_example >> >> #+name: repeated-text >> #+header: :var x="" >> #+header: :var eg="" >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp >> (let ((result)) >> (setf result (replace-regexp-in-string "%VARIANT%" x eg t)) >> result) >> #+end_src >> >> #+call: repeated-text(x="foo",eg=example) :results raw >> >> #+results: >> 1. this is the first line >> 2. this is the second line with foo as the value >> 3. this is the third line >> >> This happens, AFAICT, regardless of the value of >> org-src-preserve-indentation. >> >> Is there a reason for this? Or, is it a bug? Or, am I going about this >> task in the wrong way? >> >> All the best, >> Tom >> -- >> Thomas S. Dye >> http://www.tsdye.com >> >> -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
