Hello Stefan, again, please sent your mail also to the org mailing list. Just do a follow-up in your mail client, instead of a reply, that should do the right thing I guess.
On 2014-02-01 12:25 Stefan Huchler wrote: > Hello Alex, > > thats exactly what don´t want ^^. I tried something similar a while ago > with TBLFM function but it did not work. > > I dont care to much about how I can do it, how exactly I manage the data > (in lists in attributes in tables) I just don´t want redundancy. > > It should be no rocket science, so I can reproduce it, if nothing else > maybe you could generate org-trees from this or so. This can surely be done by using the mapping api I referenced in the first post. You need to know some elisp for this thought. But I would be willing to post something along those lines, if you wanted to go down that way. Putting the collected data into an org-tree or presenting it in another way should be doable, too. > Its sad all data is there but because org-mode dont know something like > group by, its not working. > > it would be very powerful, I thought thats what org-mode/emacs is all > about. Well, the question is, if you want to implement a whole database upon the org-format.
