Hello Bastien and Thomas,
Bastien wrote:
> thanks for starting this list.
>
> [email protected] (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>
>> C-c ! Creating timestamps
>> C-c . Creating timestamps
>> C-c # Checkboxes
>> C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files,
>> editing source code, cooperation
>> C-c , Priorities
>> C-c ; Comment lines
>> C-c ? Editing and debugging formulas
>> C-c @ Structure editing
>> C-c ^ Structure editing, plain lists, built-in table editor
>> C-c ` Built-in table editor
>> C-c ~ Cooperation
>
> (There is also C-c : (to add QUOTE) but doomed to disappear anyway.)
What about `C-c {' and such in the tables?
> I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version.
>
> For example:
>
> C-c # Checkboxes
>
> would be
>
> C-c C-# Checkboxes
>
> this would work for all of them except C-c ^ beause C-c C-^ is
> already bound to org-up-element. Maybe it can move to C-c M-^
> instead (but that's one of the keybindings that is deeply into
> my memory.)
So is it for me. As half of the above mentioned key bindings -- the
other half, I don't know/use it.
> How would everyone feel about moving those keybindings to comply
> more closely with Emacs coding recommendations?
I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will
allow us to wake up our neurons and fight against Alzheimer. So, let's
do it.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
