Hello, Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Dunno if this makes sense, but now that we have @@html: ... @@ etc., I >> wonder if it is worth considering @@italic: ... @@, or @@emphasis /: >> ... @@, or @@emphasis italic: ... @@. >> Or $[emphasis :beg "/"] ... $[emphasis :end] as previously discussed. > > No. Please no! We'll end up with XML before long :-( > > Semantically, the use of @@ is for actions that are export target > specific whereas italic etc. are text markup and inherently export > target neutral (generally). Very different beasts... > > One major attraction of org, for me, is the minimal clutter introduced > by the language so that it doesn't get in the way of the writing. I don't think we need another syntax for emphasis. Moreover, the three lines limitation can be removed at some point, i.e., once we have a powerful enough fontification system. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
