Dror Atariah <dror...@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm sorry I keep bugging with this... ;)
>
> On Dec 14, 2013, at 22:06 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
>> Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Dror Atariah <dror...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> 2. What's next? I believe this is a bug... How can I report it?
>>>
>>> Consider it reported - thanks for checking it. I'll push the proposed fix
>>> later
>>> on today. If it is wrong, we can revert it later, but at least for now
>>> it seems to fix the bug.
>>>
>>
>> I pushed the patch.
>
> I believe that the patch is wrong. The line "((eq (car x) :grouptags)
> nil)" is currently (as per the version of ELPA) #463, but it yields
> the same error as the one I reported initially. I moved it to line
> #464 (right after the one with ":newline") and it solved the issue.
>
> 1. Does it make sense?
No. I'd go back to a clean slate and try again: chances are you had
something left over (perhaps org-mobile.elc?) that's curdling thing.
The lines in question are
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(setq def-tags (mapcar
(lambda (x)
(cond ((null x) nil)
((stringp x) x)
((eq (car x) :startgroup) "{")
((eq (car x) :endgroup) "}")
((eq (car x) :grouptags) nil)
((eq (car x) :newline) nil)
((listp x) (car x))))
def-tags))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
It makes absolutely no difference whether the :grouptags line comes
before or after the :newline line: they are mutually exclusive.
In any case, where is the backtrace?
Nick
