Skip to site navigation (Press enter)

Re: [O] [RFC] vs in HTML export

Nick Dokos Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:20:07 -0800

Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> writes:

> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:21:39AM +0100, Bastien wrote:
>> Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> writes:
>> 
>> > I thing the solution is to use an <object> tag for svg, but an <img>
>> > tag for the rest.
>> 
>> Yes -- I'm no HTML guru, but this corresponds to what I see in most
>> HTML pages.
>
> Change applied. You can use the html attribute ':fallback' to specify
> a fallback image file.e.g.
>
>   #+ATTR_HTML: :width 100 :height 50 :fallback my.png
>   [[file:my.svg]]
>

Thanks  for doing this, Rick! I tested the basic functionality
(i.e. what I need :-)) and it works fine for me (with Chrome/FF on
Linux.)

Nick



  • Previous message
  • View by thread
  • View by date
  • Next message
  • [O] [RFC] <img> vs <object> in HTML export Nick Dokos
    • Re: [O] [RFC] <img> vs <object> in HTML e... Rick Frankel
      • Re: [O] [RFC] <img> vs <object> in HT... Nick Dokos
      • Re: [O] [RFC] <img> vs <object> in HT... Bastien
        • Re: [O] [RFC] <img> vs <object> i... Rick Frankel
          • Re: [O] [RFC] <img> vs <object&g... Nick Dokos
          • Re: [O] [RFC] <img> vs <object&g... Nicolas Goaziou

Reply via email to

The Mail Archive
  • The Mail Archive home
  • emacs-orgmode - all messages
  • emacs-orgmode - about the list
  • Expand
  • Previous message
  • Next message
  • The Mail Archive home
  • Add your mailing list
  • FAQ
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • 87ob3b3489.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com