Hello,
Julian Gehring <[email protected]> writes:
> Currently, it is required to specify a bibtex style when defining the
> bibliography:
>
> #+BIBLIOGRAPHY: bibfilebasename stylename optional-options
>
> Would it be reasonable to allow for a missing 'stylename'? Such that if
> 'stylename' is missing or 'nil', that:
Due to BIBLIOGRAPHY syntax, it may be easier to set it to nil instead of
removing it completely.
> a) 'stylename' is passed with the '-s' argument to 'bibtex2html' and
> b) the line '\bibliographystyle{stylename}' is not added to the latex
> output? Then, the bibtex style can be overwritten by default settings
> of the latex document. At the moment, this results in a warning about
> two conflicting styles.
>
> Would be happy to hear your opinion about this suggestion.
It sounds interesting. Would you want to provide a patch for that?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
