Eric Schulte writes: > Fixed. The test was trying to ascertain that an inline babel codeblock didn't force a newline at the end. You've just made it test that there is a trailing newline introduced by the inline babel call, which is clearly against its intent. You could have marked it as a known fail if you were planning to have this as a transitory failure only. I can't find the discussion that led to the former implementation at the moment, but I'm fairly certain that there was a bug report against trailing newlines from inline babel calls. So what is the rationale of re-introducing the trailing newline this time around?
Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra
