Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I'm not familiar with ob-octave, but I'd imagine ":results vector"
>> should do the trick.  
>
> Nope.  Unfortunately, this doesn't work.
>
> If the result I want is what is actually "output" by octave, then this
> ignores that output.  If I put ":results output vector", this doesn't
> work either for chaining although at least the results come out looking
> right.
>
> Thanks,
> eric

Sounds like someone with an interest in octave support should take a
look at ob-octave.el, this shouldn't be a difficult fix and there are
many examples of other languages (e.g., sh) handling the combination of
output and vectors.

-- 
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
PGP: 0x614CA05D

Reply via email to