Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes: > > [...] > >> I'm not familiar with ob-octave, but I'd imagine ":results vector" >> should do the trick. > > Nope. Unfortunately, this doesn't work. > > If the result I want is what is actually "output" by octave, then this > ignores that output. If I put ":results output vector", this doesn't > work either for chaining although at least the results come out looking > right. > > Thanks, > eric
Sounds like someone with an interest in octave support should take a look at ob-octave.el, this shouldn't be a difficult fix and there are many examples of other languages (e.g., sh) handling the combination of output and vectors. -- Eric Schulte https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte PGP: 0x614CA05D