Hi Seb and others, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:29:10AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > > >> (date . 1376383861) > > > > * TODO ..... :24.3: > > <2013-08-13 Tue> > > I'd use the inactive version of the timestamp, that is (for Michael) > [2013-08-13 Tue].
Doesn't the agenda show active timestamps only? Developers working on bugs might want to add the file as their agenda file. > > It would be cool if you could provide a function that uses browse-url to > > direct you to the webpage using DEBGUGS_ID: > > > > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15081> > > We could get it by adding a new link type, don't we? Indeed! I usually dislike bare links in documents. I think it breaks the flow of text. Your suggestion sounds perfect! > >> (originator . "Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpia...@gmail.com>") > > > > * TODO Making epg-context local to *epg* while let-bound! > > :24.3:org_crypt: > > :PROPERTIES: > > :DEBGUGS_ID: 15081 > > :REPORTER: Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpia...@gmail.com> > > I'd maybe use "Creator" or "CreatedBy" (with or without hyphens or underscore) > to make that "framework" less "bug-specific". That way, I guess it could stay > as well as general for common tasks in any project. Indeed a great suggestion! > BTW, is there a convention for using "ALLCAPS" or "First-letter-cap"? I mean: > the "time estimate" property is written "Effort", not "EFFORT"; is there a > convention to distinguish between Org "official" built-in properties, and > user-defined ones? Or is there another rule? (This question may sound > stupid, > but I live conventions, so that all files look the same). I'm not sure if there is any convention. > > So finally I propose the following for this particular bug. > > > > * TODO Making epg-context local to *epg* while let-bound! > > :24.3:org_crypt: > > :PROPERTIES: > > :DEBGUGS_ID: 15081 > > :REPORTER: Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpia...@gmail.com> > > :GMANE_URL: http://mid.gmane.org/877gfqkm9t....@gmail.com > > :END: > > 152 <2013-08-13 Tue> > > What's this 152? A typo? It's a typo. :-p > > What do others think? Is it a good start? > > I like your work a lot! Thank you :). -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
