Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>>> And I agree with you, beginning of line is a good target column. >>> >>> On reading Nicolas's explanation, I agree too. This is better. >> >> The decision should be based on what the user would do after doing a >> C-down and C-up. >> >> If *you* use C-down and C-up for persusal (as yourself say), I don't >> think you will use C-k immediately. I sense that you are not >> representing yourself in a consistent way. > > I don't think regular `forward-paragraph' cares about what the user do > with it. It puts point at beginning of lines and that's it.
I am provoking Suvayu to defend himself, if that's not already clear to you :-). > `org-forward-linear-element' exists because some users want C-down with > a more intense `forward-paragraph' flavour. Let me provoke you a bit :-). What is the difference between forward and linear. Is it linear only because it stays in column 0 always? OR Is it linear because it is monotonic in how the cursor moves. If you side with latter explanation, then I would argue that this notion of linearity is no different from what is implied by forward. Btw, I have no issues if you don't want to support `org-forward-nonlinear-element'. Yes, if the command does M-m automatically at end, the cursor position will become curvilinear. > Regards,
