> Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm afraid that pure AWK does not provide
> date computation support. That's why I did not implement this.
okay, it does sound like a lot to ask awk to do.

> So I would definitely vote to extend the repeater syntax with a count.

great.

> I assume that your initial example RRULE would require either "...4+1d>"
> or "+1d:4"

Yes, thanks.

Stephen

Reply via email to