> Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm afraid that pure AWK does not provide > date computation support. That's why I did not implement this. okay, it does sound like a lot to ask awk to do.
> So I would definitely vote to extend the repeater syntax with a count. great. > I assume that your initial example RRULE would require either "...4+1d>" > or "+1d:4" Yes, thanks. Stephen
