Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes:
> Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes:
>> I don't know much about references and bibliographies in org (there have
>> been some discussions recently on the list I think but I haven't
>> followed them), but AFAIK the \bibliography stuff is just text as far as
>> org is concerned and is passed verbatim to the output file. It just
>> happens that when the output file is processed through latex and
>> friends, they can make some sense out of it. The rest of the world (org
>> included and all its exporters) remains blissfully ignorant - that's my
>> story in any case and until somebody proves me wrong, I'm sticking with
>> it.
>
> It's pretty much true. There's a org-bibtex or an ox-bibtex. Neither
> work to my satisfaction. The best solution that I've tried is still
> links (there was a new solutions posed recently (on github) and
> there's Zotero-integration as well, which I haven't tried). Using
> \cite{.} directly is frail as it can break over lines.
I see, thanks!
--
cheers,
Thorsten
