Hello, Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >>> Sorry, but using this has quadratic complexity with the number of >>> rows... >> >> That's true. But that doesn't matter unless you plan to export thousand >> row tables. Anyway, patches welcome. > > I've been thinking about this… the way I currently see it is that the > row-number should be a property of the table-row, just like the > rwo-group is. The row-group isn't a property of the table-row. It is computed in `org-export-table-row-group'. A simple optimization would be to memoize row numbers. But, as I stated earlier, this is not the bottleneck here. Huge tables are not, IMO, common enough to justify this. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
