Hello, Bastien <b...@altern.org> writes:
> Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >> It is replacing old `org-export-allow-BIND' (note that they do not share >> the same set of possible values). > > Is there a reason for not allowing 'confirm? Yes. It is a pain in the neck to implement, and not vital since you can specify it as a buffer-local variable anyway. > Also, I'd rather stick to the old name since it is good enough > and will spare many users with the hassle of finding out how to > correctly set the new variable, which is very sensitive. It isn't sensitive: it defaults to nil. Therefore a user unable to find it is still safe. Moreover, it will be documented, won't it? > What do you think? I didn't like gratuitous caps in the old name. I prefer the new one. Other than dubious aesthetics reason, I don't mind its name. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
